Validation of a scale measuring research methodological competencies in postgraduate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53645/revprop.v5i2.80Keywords:
Higher science education, postgraduate courses, methodology, skills, validity, reliabilityAbstract
Methodological competence is crucial for research-oriented graduate programs; hence the need to have data collection instruments that meet the quality standards for its measurement, including the attributes of reliability and validity. This paper describes the design, construction, and validation process of an instrument that allows to measure such construct. In order to do this, a scale was developed following a mixed method. In the qualitative phase teachers were interviewed from the different graduate programs in the state of Sonora, Mexico, to identify the abilities that every researcher must have regardless of the discipline in which he or she works; furthermore, a literature review was made to complement these findings. Afterward, in the quantitative phase the scale was designed considering the indicators of the previous phase; it was administered to the students of the different graduate programs oriented to the training of researchers in the state of Sonora, and its validity and reliability was determined. As a result, the initial scale consisted of 30 items, but after the reliability and factorial structure analysis an instrument of 23 items was obtained. Likewise, the confirmatory factor analysis suggested a four-factor model and showed that the scale is empirically adequate for the measurement of the construct: X2 = 417.08, p = .000; CMIN/DF = 1.92; CFI= .95; GFI= .90; NFI= .91; RMSEA = .054, SRMR=.0478. It is concluded that the scale fulfills the appropriate metric properties for the measurement of the construct
Downloads
References
Al – Habashneh, M. H., y Najjar, N. J. (2017). Constructing a Criterion Reference Test to Measure the Research and Statistical Competencies of Graduate Students at the Jordanian Governmental Universities. Journal of Education and Practice, 8 (2), pp. 67-81. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1131564.pdf
Hernández, E., Estrada, V., & Keeling, M. (2018). Perspectivas y desafíos de la gestión del conocimiento y la competencia investigativa en la educación de posgrado. UCE Ciencia Revista de postgrado, 6 (1). http://uceciencia.edu.do/index.php/OJS/article/view/123
Creswell, J. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixted methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
De Vellis, R. (2012). Scale development. Theory and applications. SAGE.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L., y Black, W.C. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Prentice Hall.
Hu, L.T. y Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariancestructure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, pp. 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Ismail, R., y Mohd, S. (2012). Evaluating the Research Competencies of Doctoral Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, pp. 244-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.271
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., y Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 3, pp. 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Méndez, T., Ojeda, M. M., y Hernández, J. (2014). El informe del primer estudio de egresados del posgrado. En M. M. Ojeda, S. Figueroa, Bernal, B., y C. R. Castro (Coord.), Primer estudio de egresados del posgrado de la Universidad Veracruzana, (pp. 15-52). imaginarial Editores.
Mohn, T., Effendi, K., Pramela, Z., Choo, D., y Mahmod, D. (2011). Developing an Instrument to Measure Research Skills. Procedia – social Behavioral Sciencies 60 (2012), pp. 630-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.434
National Postdoctoral Association [NPA]. (2019). Core competencies Checklist. Recuperado de https://www.nationalpostdoc.org/page/CoreCompetencies
Swank, J. M., y Lambie, G. W. (2016). Development of the Research Competencies Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(2), pp. 91-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748175615625749
Valdés, Á., y Vera, J., y Martínez, A. (2012). Competencias científicas en estudiantes de posgrado de ciencias naturales e ingenierías. Sinéctica, Revista Electrónica de Educación, (39), pp. 1-16. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=998/99826889012
Zambrano-Sandoval, H. & Chacón-Corzo, C.T. (2021). Competencias investigativas en la formación de posgrado. Análisis cualitativo. Revista Educación, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v45i1.43646

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Martha Olivia Ramírez Armenta, Ramona Imelda García López, Ruben Edel Navarro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo mientras se dé atribución al creador.Incluye los siguientes elementos: POR – Se debe dar crédito al creador NC – Solo se permiten usos no comerciales de la obra.