Two dissident readings on equality

Authors

  • Ana Esther Ceceña Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53645/revpropulsion.v2i1.51

Keywords:

igualdad, modernidad, diferencia, completud, sujetidad, intersubjetividad

Abstract

This article presents two dissident readings about the concept of equality. The first debate its content and form emanating from capitalist modernity, starting from the discussion of what is called here the Monsanto way, a paradigm of that capitalist way of being and doing consisting of the establishment of processes of homogenization, equalization, order, individualization, disproportion, de-subjectization and predation, constituted during the five hundred years of existence of the world system. The second focuses on the Cherrapunji mode, to illustrate that in the face of this simplification of life and the threat of its annihilation, difference, diversity, complexity, complementation, proportionality, subjectivity, intersubjectivity and coupling of subjects are constituted. that were otrized by capitalist modernity, imposing both a challenge before the prevailing logic of destruction and death, as well as a possibility of constituting another possible world based on the principle of completeness and community action where, although equality does not reign, that It is neither required nor desired, it does place life as the center of a new non-capitalist way of being and doing.

Downloads

References

Ceceña, A. E. (1998) “Proceso de automatización y creación de los equivalentes generales tecnológicos” en La tecnología como instrumento de poder. México: El Caballito.

McDougall, P. (2013). “El carro delante del caballo. Semillas, suelos y campesinos. ¿Quién controla los insumos agrícolas?” en Informe 2013 ETC Group Cuaderno nº 111, septiembre.

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. Estados Unidos: Yale University Press.Fortune, revista, 1955, 500.

Fortune, revista, 2015, 500. http://fortune.com/global500/

Marshall, A. (2013). “Brazil, Canada and South Africa bullish on agbiotech” en Nature Biotechnology, 31.http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n4/box/nbt.2552_BX4.html

Monsanto. (2016). Monsanto vegetable seeds. http://www.monsanto.com

Ollantay, I. (2015). “Qué paradoja: ellos dicen tener filosofía, nosotros únicamente cosmovisión”.

http://www.telesurtv.net/bloggers/Que-paradoja-ellos-dicen-tener-filosofia-nosotros-unicamente-cosmovision-20151203-0002.html

Published

2021-01-15 — Updated on 2021-01-15

Versions

How to Cite

Ceceña, A. E. (2021). Two dissident readings on equality. Interdisciplina En Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 2(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.53645/revpropulsion.v2i1.51